I’m A Believer. After reading Eric Lefcowitz’s “Monkee Business”, you may be too.


posted by Therracat

As anyone who geeks out for a TV series, artist, band, book or genre can attest, you can take a lot of abuse from “non-believers” who don’t share or understand your passion. Fans of the Monkees have certainly gotten their share of slagging over the decades, both from the media and from those who fancy themselves rock and roll purists.

 The popular ’60s show has been named by TIME as one of the 100 Best TV Shows of All Time and the Monkees reunion tours have been bankable successes. The lads, now all lads over 60, still draw crowds (and teenagers) to their solo shows, so, for the sake of argument,  lets assume they at least have had staying power, shall we?

 Oh. Do I have an attitude? Is it showing? When people who obviously didn’t get it would, over the years, question my mad Monkee love I always wanted to snap back, “Shut up. They weren’t made for you. They were made for me.” In truth, the Monkees were likely “made” for girls older than me, those with bras and bumped-up hair, but when they exploded onto the scene I was 6 or 7 and I had a very real sense of what I liked, music-wise. And I liked the Monkees. I put them next to my Hollies and Bee Gees and Rolling Stones albums and plotted grade school ways to get to from England to California, ways that didn’t involve me getting in trouble with my parents or missing too much school. For I was sure that was where I would find them, in sunny SoCal, in that bitchin’ beach house, driving that badass GTO.  I was young and to me, ”The Monkees” was a reality show.  I’d never been to the United States. It looked and sounded like the promised land to me.

Despite a certain amount of teasing and eye-rolling over the years by people who liked to rib me about my devotion to the Monks I still had enough knowledge and music cred in my arsenal to take on any purists in a duel. If I didn’t win, at least I dented the argument that the Monkees didn’t matter.  No more worries on that.  If people give me a problem about my hot Monkee love  I now can just hand them Eric Lefcowitz’s new book

 Author Eric Lefcowitz  (“Rhino History of Rock and Roll: The ‘70s”, “Buy American: Buy This Book”, “Tomorrow Never Knows: The Beatles’ Last Concert”, and more) has taken on the history, making, un-making and re-making of the group once before, in his book “The Monkees Tale”.  So much has happened in Monkee-ville since that book was released fourteen years ago that he’s added some new thoughts directly from Michael Nesmith, brought us up-to-date on the drama (and make no mistake, there IS drama) and added photos and new news to the history of the made for TV band that many refer to as the “pre-fab four” (pre-fab as in “built to order” not pre-Beatles era). “Monkee Business, The Revolutionary Made For TV Band” is a perfect book for those who love the Monkees and/or  those who love the messy, magical, musical 1960s. Jimi Hendrix, The Beatles, Stephen Stills, Janis Joplin, Neil Diamond,  Frank Zappa, Carole King, they’re all in the book and play a part in the history of  the Monkees, or vice-versa. It’s well–researched glimpse into a true show business phenomenon complete with fabulous photos by legendary photog Henry Diltz .

Eric was kind enough to answer a few questions about the band and his new book and in the process, gave me even more info to lob at non-believers.

Therra C. Gwyn: Like a lot of writers I know, you are fluent in several genres. You’ve written about popular music and you have an extensive knowledge of the subject.  What, to you, is the importance of chronicling the life and times of the Monkees, over another band from that time period? Why the Monkees?

Eric Lefcowitz: Not to get too cosmic about it all but I feel the Monkees, in a way, represent all of us. There’s a human element to their story that transcends all the trappings of their fame. They were four eager young guys who happily signed on for the ride and then found out the destination was not quite what they were anticipating. For me, their rebellion is what clinched the deal (in terms of my fascination with the group). It would have been so much easier to just go with the flow. Their effort to express themselves within the confines of their “gilded cage” was an extraordinary development. That DIY-spirit that informs “Headquarters” is so honest and pure. Artistically that album may be miles away from “Sgt. Peppers” but as a statement of purpose I think it’s still quite valid. Both albums were released at the same time and of course the Beatles got the lion’s share of the credit but if you gave me a choice I’d rather listen to “Headquarters.” Within its own context, I think it holds up better. Yes, I said it. The other part of their legacy that sealed the deal for me was “Head.” There is something so wonderfully weird about that movie. It almost dares you to hate it (especially the first few scenes) but the more you watch it the more you begin to detect its genius. The fact that it was totally ignored by the public doesn’t matter now and I’d rather watch “Head” than “Let it Be” any day. Now I’m hardly trying to stoke an argument about which band (Beatles/Monkees) is better–that would be foolhardy. I love them both. But in terms of cultural relevance today, I think the Monkees–the brand and the band–tower over many of the so-called hipster bands of their day. And the reason for that makes for a fascinating story.

Therra: You outline in the book the many talented people who contributed material to the Monkees success (Carole King, et al). How important do you think famed songwriting duo Boyce and Hart were to their hit-making machine at that time?

Eric: Boyce and Hart were really the unsung heroes of the Monkees. Let’s face it; if the Monkees’ first records stunk they would just be a curio today. But those early Boyce and Hart tracks were amazing. They were absolutely the right guys at the right time. The theme song is a nifty bit of craft work, an instant identifiable ear worm (even little kids know it today) but also ever-so-slightly subversive. The same thing goes for “Last Train to Clarksville.” I heard Bob Dylan talking about that song on his radio show and he said something to the effect that the best way to be subversive was to not let anybody know you’re being subversive. I had no idea that there was an anti-war message built into “Clarksville” when I first heard it but there was something desperate in Micky’s delivery that hinted at it. It’s a classic, as are “Steppin Stone,” “She,” etc, etc. There isn’t a duff track that Boyce and Hart did with the Monkees and it’s a shame they didn’t do more (in my opinion). Also I’ve been lucky enough to meet and talk to Bobby Hart a few times and I have to say he is probably the nicest guy I’ve ever met in show business. Plus, if I recall correctly, he had a swimming pool shaped like a guitar at his house. How cool is that? 

 Therra: Pretty cool. And now I want one. Okay, In “Monkee Business” you touch on the big debate about whether the Monkees should be inducted into the Rock and Roll Hall Of Fame. Do you think they deserve to be there?

 Eric: That they deserve to be there is without question but I feel even discussing the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame (which has left out many, many other worthy bands) plays right into Jann Wenner’s trap. It’s all about the canonization of a certain Baby Boomer mentality that just turns my stomach and Wenner is the epitome of that bullsh*t (if I can say bullsh*t in print)! We should all move on because it isn’t going to happen, at least not while Wenner walks the Earth. I do think all Monkees fans could work to see that Boyce and Hart are inducted into the Songwriting Hall of Fame, however. That is much more likely to happen and they truly deserve the honor.

 Therra: Finally, if you had to use one word to describe Davy, Micky, Mike and Peter, individually, what would that one-word-per-Monkee be?

 Eric: Davy: Showbiz. Micky: Natural. Peter: Heartfelt. Mike: Seeker

Backstage at the Resurrection with James Lee Stanley


posted by therracat          

If you don’t know James Lee Stanley, I’m not going to raise a “Where have you been?” eyebrow, but I am sending out a clarion call that if you are a fan of the thinking traveling troubadour type you might want to pay him some attention. If you like James Taylor or JD Souther you will enjoy James Lee Stanley. If you like your singers to have a grand voice and a spot-on wicked sense of humour, you will enjoy James Lee Stanley. If you’ve ever wondered what it was like to be kicked off a tour while opening for a major act because you opened too well, you may want to ask James Lee Stanley.          

 I first met James when I was writing for a paper in Georgia and he was performing with an old buddy of his, Peter Tork (yeah, of Monkees fame) at the Birchmere in Alexandria, Va. The occasion was a tribute to the wonderful John Stewart, who not only penned the #1 hit “Daydream Believer” for the aforementioned Monkees but was a member of the Kingston Trio.  He had a hit of his own in 1979 with ”Gold”, from what is surely a record with one of the all-time great album titles, “Bombs Away Dream Babies”.  The tribute to him was a great night in so many ways and one I’ve revisited fondly in my memory banks since Stewart passed on.  He was still alive in 2001 (note: kudos to the Birchmere for holding these things while the tributee is still with us).  A lovely human, John Stewart could not have been any nicer to me, which I appreciated because meeting a legend can be nerve wracking for anyone who has watched and listened to them for years. Meeting famous people can be one of those things you revel in or regret, depending on the celebrity and that’s just a fact. Stewart was genial and kind. He put his arm around me and introduced me to his family, acting as if he’d known me for years and as if he was genuinely happy that I was there. This fan’s grateful heart did a jig.  

 Fabulous femmes  Nanci Griffith, Eliza Gilkyson, and Rosanne Cash were there to pay homage to Stewart. I was walking around talent central it seemed, and about to get a bonus.  James Lee  introduced himself to me in the press room that afternoon as I was talking to a member of  Nanci Griffith’s band about his friend/my longtime crush, Nick Lowe. Not many people could have pulled my interest away from that conversation but I liked James immediately and rather wanted to follow him around. It’s kind of hard not to like him. He’s tall, with an open face and expressive eyes. He could pass as your favourite college professor or, in the right light, like a clean cowboy you would take home to mom (who would soon tell you he was “keeper”).  James was solicitous and amusing this particular evening ( indeed, Peter Tork has oft referred to James as one of the quickest and funniest people he knows). Later that night James kindly introduced me to Noel Paul Stookey (Paul of Peter, Paul and Mary). I remember thinking, who is this guy? He knows everyone.          

Photo by Andrea Cross

 

  One specific memory I have of that event is of James and me backstage in the late afternoon, not talking, kind of involved in individual thought when the door flies open and Nanci Griffith strides in. She’s moving fast, toting her guitar, beautiful in profile, a lit cigarette in her mouth, smoke floating in a wake behind her like a wispy entourage.  I was stunned but quiet as she disappeared into the dressing room. “Wow!” James said out loud, “Nanci Griffith smokes!” I loved him from that moment on.  James says things out loud.        

 He hasn’t stopped touring, writing or recording in decades, lucky for his fans, and he’s on a creative tear putting together a new CD, “Backstage at the Resurrection”.  I had a chance to ask him some questions recently and he was kind enough to assuage my curiosity.          

 Therra: Your new CD “Backstage at the Resurrection”, to be released later this year, is somewhat different from your previous releases, isn’t it?  Tell us a little about it.          

 James Lee Stanley: Well, it was recorded over the past year and last year I began taking guitar lessons, (after forty years of self-taught stuff, I thought it was time to learn something) so the guitar work is different.           

Secondly, during the reign of terror on the constitution that was the Bush era, I was evidently depressed all the time.   I know that the whole world is turning to caca right now, but when Obama got elected, I got happy.   The cd’s I released during the appointed president’s reign were all informed by my sadness and helplessness in the face of what he was doing to the economy, the environment, our world standing, the surplus, the constitution, etc.  Once we got that bastard out, I just got happy.   This is a happy cd, you will be dancing your buns off to this one.          

Thirdly, I have some great rock guitar playing on this cd in the form of Lenny Ruckle from Santa Cruz.   He did a great job and took the recording someplace else.  I can’t wait for you to hear this puppy.          

 T: Your live performances are a treat, because you not only have a wonderful singing voice, you are exceedingly funny. You appeared to have the “Storytellers” format down pat long before it became a  fixture on VH1. Is there any story you have just not been able to retire because people want to hear it every time they see you?          

 JLS: There are actually a bunch.   People still want to hear the digitalis song and story;  the cookie monster story (with the blue shag bathroom) will never go away evidently, and my Star Trek adventures from when I was on Star Trek Deep Space Nine also seem to be perennial favorites.          

I did some dates with a remarkable raconteur named Gamble Rogers and he is the one who told me that my stories were like my songs in that people would want to hear them again and again and that they would bring their friends to hear them.   He was the inspiration to work on them just like I do my songs or my recordings.          

I try to tell all the stories during the course of a year to keep them fresh in my mind.   And I’ve started documenting what I did where so that when I come back I can do something else…unless they specifically request a story they’ve heard.          

  T:  James, You’ve been in this crazy creative business for a while. I almost fell over when you told me you knew Jennifer Warnes, such a fan of her am I. You have been featured in a famous syndicated cartoon (“Cathy”) because the creator was a big fan of yours, you’ve appeared on “Star Trek- Deep Space Nine”, and you’ve toured with some famous folks, recorded with some well known musicians and hung around with some household names. Tell a little about the best and/or even the worst experience you’ve ever had with these people who we all seem to know. Obviously you don’t have to name names if you’re gonna diss someone, but you have some great tales, James, of the good, the better, the bad and the ugly in show business, it’s a fact. Give us some dish, darling.          

 JLS: Well I must be discreet here and I don’t want to be telling tales out of school.  I quit one tour with a major star because he was simply too much of an a—hole.    Wouldn’t allow me a spotlight or an announcement and frequently demanded I start my portion of the show within minutes of the doors being opened, so I was mainly playing while everyone was looking for their seats.  I finally quit.  Bonnie Raitt, who didn’t have the big hits yet, replaced me.  She quit after two gigs.   I did five.  (I needed the money, but finally decided I’d rather have the self-respect of blowing this bozo off).          

 On another tour, the other main act left his guitar in another state on a brief break and we had to drive across the state to retrieve it.   He couldn’t quite remember where the place was and then no one was home, so I had to second story it and break in.   Came out the front door while he was standing there wondering what to do.  I told him he owed those folks a window.          

 Did another show with a major star as the opening act, of course, and on the first show got four encores and a standing ovation…and got fired off the tour.  But enough about me…what do YOU think…about me.          

  T:  Here’s what I think. You did a wonderful recording with John Batdorf called “All Wood and Stones”. I want to know how that came about.           

 JLS: At a friend’s wedding the band took a break and someone suggested that I go up there and do a tune or two.  Two other songwriters were there as well.   So the three of us went up there…and discovered that we each only knew our own songs.   Then Rod MacDonald asked me if I knew” Ruby Tuesday”.  I said I knew the chorus.  I took the low harmony, George Merrill took the high harmony and we took off.   The wedding party literally came up to the stage while we were doing it.   Ran up actually, like a Disney movie or something. On the way home I said to my wife, you know, no one has really presented the songs of the rolling stones in their most favorable light.   They wrote some great songs.   So I decided to do the project.  I invited my pal, John Batdorf, to do it with me and the rest, as they say…          

 T: You also write a very informative and popular blog for performing artists. You’ve had over half a million hits on the site already. Congrats, by the way, as that’s no small feat. Tell the readers where they can lay eyes on your wit and wisdom for artists on the web and what prompted you to start writing it.          

 JLS: The blog, is a free artist resource site called Datamusicata.   You can find it at:   www.datamusicata.com   and I write a column for it two to three times a week, about everything from how to string a guitar to mic technique to practicing to touring to house guesting.   Everything I can think of that might help folks do this music thing.   Or… any artistic  venture.   It came about because my wife told me that I probably knew more about touring than anyone, having been at it for decades.  She said I knew things I didn’t know I knew and I should start giving back to the community.   So I tried it and we’ve just crested 700,000 hits.   Seems to be helping someone.          

 I also invite any other people who have something to add to post and I put up their websites and pertinent info.     I would like it to be someplace that anyone can go and find out anything about any end of the music business.          

 And I have a search engine on the site.  Type in a topic and every article pertaining to that will show up.   And there is also a comment section at the end of each article.  I read and respond to all the comments.          

Photo by Cindi Byrkit

 

Peter Tork Explains It All For You


By Therra Cathryn Gwyn

In 2001 when The Monkees (sans Mike Nesmith, who had not appeared with them since 1997) were offered proper sums of money and succumbed to fans demand to tour again, I had an opportunity to interview Peter Tork,  the band’s multi-instrumentalist and the generally cheery philosopher of the group. This interview was conducted many years before I represented him as his publicist or started The Peter Tork Hope On Project when he was fighting a rare form of cancer. It was also long before I asked him, and he kindly agreed, to write an advice column called “Ask Peter Tork” for my online magazine, The Daily Panic.   He did a great job and that success prompted other publications, The Washingon Post among them, to ask him write an op-ed here, an article or blog post there, something he proved very good at. However, in 2001 the advice column was six years away. We’d met only a few times previous to my interviewing him. This particular interview has appeared in whole and in part in some magazines in Europe/Asia and in various venues on the internet. Reading it now I have to laugh. I do count this as one of the more interesting interviews I’ve ever done. It’s not that often you find performers willing or even able to be as blunt as Peter can be on a regular basis. That can be a double-edged sword but it wasn’t one that was a problem this day. Personally, I find a real conversation much more interesting than a carefully canned or rehearsed one.

Who would have thought the celestial Jimi Hendrix would succumb to the excesses of the 1960s and the band he once opened for, The Monkees, would still be making the girls (and grandmothers) scream in the 21st century? In this interview from 2001 Peter Tork explains it all for you.

Peter Tork and Davy Jones, 2001. Photo credit: Therra C Gwyn

I have a memory that many people share. Before MTV and pay-per-view concerts, before Vegas specials and Behind The Music, I was staring at the television for a half-hour one night a week and could not be dragged away for love nor punishment. As a young child ( in my case, I’d been on the planet almost seven years) I was fully enthralled with what was then the revolutionary freshness of none other than the Monkees. Yes, those Monkees, as in the ” Hey, hey we are the…” variety. Remember? The 1960′s TV show and the catchy hits written by Carole King and Neil Diamond? The mid-1980′s MTV darlings doing packed stadium tours? There’s an undeniable appeal there. Trust me on this if you are a non-believer. At the very least, give a girl a chance to explain.

It was some thirty years or so after the initial primetime run of the show that I was on a highway somewhere between Jacksonville and Atlanta when all my childhood excitement over the group came to fore. My best friend ( and often partner-in-crime), Sherri Nielson and I were in a brand new, fire-engine red Camaro convertible, top down, music blaring, speeding in between shows on what was billed as the Monkees ”Final Tour”. I had been trying, with no success, to hook up ( in an interview kind of way) with Peter Tork to chronicle this newest chapter in the Monkees journey through time. Even with help of his preternaturally patient manager, Bonnie Verrico, I wasn’t having much luck thus far. Actually, I was having none.

The tour had begun several nights before in Clearwater with Natural, Lou Pearlman’s ( N’Sync, Backstreet Boys) latest boy band experiment inserted midway through each evening to give the younger lads some exposure and experience and to allow the older lads a break in a show that often ran three hours. Despite media criticism that haunted the Monkees early success and sometimes still follows them to this day, this “pre-fab four” as they’ve been called, are really a hardworking, cohesive group onstage. The group is hardly a one-trick pony, although admittedly, the trick they are best collectively known for is a pretty innocuous one. The Monkees are all in their fifties now and are aging fairly well. Peter Tork looks at least 5 years younger. When he smiles the years fall away. Micky Dolenz’s voice is a powerful pop instrument that time hasn’t seemed to change. Their concerts are a lively combination of their popular hits, some of the TV show schtick, and include a solo spot for each member to show off his particular brand of musical talent/interest. Davy Jones, an energetic performer who knows his audience and courts them, does Broadway, charmingly. Dolenz sings ” Since I Fell For You” like he means it . Tork, dressed nightly in a Sgt. Pepper-by-way-of-Melrose stage outfit, hits the rock standards, tearing it up like a teenager on Little Richard’s “Lucille” and performing a bright version (on banjo, no less) of Jackie Wilson’s “Higher and Higher”. For those who may be sneering ( and have actually read this far), yes, the Monkees play their own instruments ( please, when did this become an actual issue in a business filled with fake body parts and Britney Spears non-live concerts?). They are backed by a full band, including a section of interpretive-dancing horn players. The sound onstage is almost as full as the screaming ( yes, even now) in the audience. It appears that the Monkees most enduring legacy may be that they simply make people happy.

I had done my research, talking to the variety of fans who still follow the group, and one thing became apparent very quickly. They worship their favorite Monkee. like any true fan of any boy band. You have to have a favorite, right? To have, to hold, to hope they are hetero. These particular fans are proud of  their Monkee, whichever one it is that has captured their heart. Tork’s fans proved very protective and vocal.

” If you are going to take pictures of him, don’t use a flash, ” one 40-year-old fan informed me archly, ” He doesn’t like it.”

“He’s really very shy,” offered a teen young enough to be a Monkee granddaughter.

” He can get testy on ya,” a Micky Dolenz fan sniffed, sizing me up, it appeared, as not Monkee-worthy.

“He’s not dumb like he plays on TV!” , a woman and her husband insisted.

“He’s sexy,” a young mother sighed.

“Okay, ” I said, scribbling notes for an interview I didn’t know if I’d ever get, ” No flash, shy, smart, testy, sexy…got it.”

Later, in the lobby of yet another crowded venue, Sherri handed me a drink and asked , ” If you speak to this guy, are you going to confess that you had your very first ‘I love this boy’ fantasy about him?” I shook my head. ” No way, ” I swore. I had once worked on a Rolling Stones tour and easily managed not to tell Mick Jagger about my teenage fantasies involving him. I wasn’t going to start revealing any silly stuff from my youth to a Monkee I couldn’t even corner for a 15-minute chat.

As fate and determination would have it, the interview finally took place a few months later. Tork was at his home in California, in between tour dates. This was a tour which would eventually take much of the summer and claim much of the patience of all members of the band. The Monkees bandwagon crashed and burned in August in a somewhat typical rock band rift and it seemed that the fans who followed the group might indeed have witnessed the “Final Tour”, at least with this line-up. But when we talked in very early summer things were still merry and bright, at least on the surface.

Peter Tork on tour w/ The Monkees 2001

     Photo credit: Therra Cathryn Gwyn, 2001.

After a flurry of e-mails Monkee and writer connected by phone.
” Hi, it’s Peter,” the polite voice on the other end of the phone sounded familiar, still a touch of East Coast in the accent. We talked for over an hour, yet it was several minutes before I even got to ask a first,  planned, question. His in-the-moment way of going places verbally can serve to throw a person like me off-balance, at least initially. I got the idea he might have this particular chat almost with whomever was on the other end of the phone, it just happened to be me at the time. That’s okay, I thought. I’d waited a long time and logged a lot of miles to get to this chat and my interview style tended more towards conversational than central-themed anyway.

“I’m checking to see what the age of consent is in different states” he offered, un-asked, before I could say anything. Peter was evidently sitting in front of his computer while talking to me. ” Look at this. In Maryland it’s sixteen. That’s considered the South, right? It’s below the Mason-Dixon line? Tennessee, sixteen again…South Carolina, fourteen?…hmmmm… in North Carolina it’s sixteen…no surprise there…” he goes on to rattle off other states and ages. Finally, I had to ask ; “Why is this of interest to you?”

“Well, at one gig in Maryland, about a year ago, these two girls came up to me. I think they were about 15 or 16. They asked for an autograph and I teased them, said  ‘It’ll cost ya…”. They said, ” Oh anything!’, and I thought ‘Anything?.’”

“Well, ” I try not to sound too worldly, ” You know if you had one of them, you’d have to take both.”

” Oh really? Why?”

” Because, Peter, ” I can’t believe I’m having to explain this to him, ” Teenage girls do everything together. Hang out, stay in, go to the ladies room…everything.”

“Oh, ” he sounds amused, “Do you think they were looking for ‘a scene’?”

I had to laugh. “I don’t know. Did anything happen?”

“No. And the last time I was in town I didn’t see them there. I am attracted to younger people, certainly, but I find that although it’s good in theory, it doesn’t always work in practice.”

In all those Florida miles I hadn’t planned on the interview starting out like this. But I went with it. Why not? If we were going to talk about sex, so be it. We were both adults. I mentally crossed off being able to sell the interview to any G-rated  magazines.

TCG: So, how old were you when you lost your virginity?

PT: Twenty.

TCG: No way.

PT: Twenty.

TCG: In America that sounds about right. In Europe it tends to be younger, I’ve heard. Actually, I don’t know if that is the case any more. Speaking of age, you have people of all ages that attend your solo and group shows. By now the Monkees have been together longer than many married couples, longer than many bands, longer than some of your fans have been alive.

PT: Thirty-five years. Our older fans are still at the shows but the median age is in the thirties now. Our original fans are still there, but are older, settled, have kids. Some are grandparents.

TCG: Hmmm, I’m not a grandparent but I was part of your original audience.

PT: How old are you, Therra?

TCG: (dodging the question slightly) I was 6 and living in London when the Monkees hit. I was crazy about you guys. Everyone was. So, if you lost your virginity at twenty, do you remember who you had your first sexual fantasy about?

PT: Annette Funicello. I thought she was great.

TCG: I didn’t figure you for someone who preferred brunettes.

PT: I really have no preferences in that area. Now, the funny thing is, I really thought I would actually get along better with (fellow Mouseketeer) Darlene Gillespie. She was the better entertainer. She had a charge. Annette was great, but Darlene, she was a powerhouse.

TCG: Annette had that big chest, didn’t she?

PT: And the lovely part was that we got to see it grow. The first year it was flat, the second and third year it was bigger, and so on.

TCG: Tell me another female performer you like.

PT: I love Liv Ullman. She just grabs me. She knocks me out, really. Understand I am talking about her in her prime…if she chose, she could do the mature woman’s roles now…but she, really…wow.

TCG: Liv Ullman has a rather delicate Nordic beauty about her.

PT: I don’t know about delicate, but yeah, she has those Nordic looks. I love it. Maybe it’s because of my own Scandinavian background, I don’t know. She’s the whole package, as opposed to…well, I love a bimbo… I am not adverse to empty-headed bimbos. But a woman who is smart and who knocks me out to look at, that’s the whole package.

TCG: I hear that from a lot of men. I do hope it’s true that men like smart girls. Are there female vocalists you like?

PT: Gladys Knight. Magnificent face, and in my opinion the greatest soul singer ever. Now, Aretha, she’s in a class by herself, she’s Aretha. Gladys is great. The best. When she sings, she commits. There’s also Mavis Staples. They are both great for the same reasons. When they are in their song, there’s no sense of holding back, or protecting the voice. They are right there, complete commitment.

TCG: Who do you feel a kinship with, musically? Any person or group?

PT: To various extents I have a strong feeling for James Taylor, Jackson Browne, Bonnie Raitt. People where one performance has really gotten me. I feel some kinship, but not like brothers or a sister, just a connection. I identify with them on some levels, but on other levels they are just so over my head.

TCG: What do you think of Prince?

PT: Brilliant.

TCG: Leonard Cohen?

PT: Lugubrious. (Sings a snippet of ” Suzanne” in a dirge-like manner, to illustrate).

TCG:  You don’t “get” Leonard, I think. Elvis Presley?

PT: The first flash of Elvis was almost unbearable it was so wonderful. My musical partner James Lee Stanley blames the Colonel for Elvis’s untimely demise.

TCG: Has your music been influenced by any literary works?

PT: I cannot put my finger on too much of it . Well… “The Most Unkindest Cut”. I was told in a songwriting class that the title was redundant. I said to them ‘ Ah, no, it’s from Shakespeare.’ Micky Dolenz said something when we were doing Justus ( 1996 music release featuring all four original Monkees). He said to me, ‘You’re the one we count on to arrange the songs so they sound like full songs, from beginning to end.’ I didn’t realize that. I gain my sense of arrangement from Bach.

TCG:  Bach? No kidding?

PT: Yes. Bach was psychedelic. Here, wait. I’m going to play something for you. ( Pause ) Can you hear this? (Strains of a synthesizer float in the background)

TCG: Yes, I hear it.

He plays a wildly beautiful piece of music, explaining at different junctures where tones and chords change in an unexpected manner, why it’s so radical and influential, and why, in his opinion Bach was ” a world of musical adventure”, and Mozart ” a toady”.
 
“Mozart wrote for the aristocracy.” he sniffs, “It shows.”
 
He occasionally stops for a millisecond, says ” Oops, sorry!”. (Did he make a mistake? How would I know?) Then he continues or sometimes plays a refrain again. What I’ve been hearing , it turns out, is part of “Prelude in D Minor for the Clavier”.
 

PT: Bach gets extraordinarily wild. I played a piece for Davy Jones and he wanted to know who it was. I told him it was Bach and he said ‘What was he – a madman?!’ ( laughs ). Bach was so influential, he does trips through harmony that no one else does. Almost all Western music is in Bach.

TCG: If we – meaning the public – look, as we often do, to certain “entertainment moments” to define ourselves, to define our place in time, what do you think the Monkees represent to your fans?

PT: No remarkable effect. I mean, the internet works for everybody. Every artist has a website, the fans chat, it’s democratic. I will say that I think the one thing the internet has allowed is anonymity and people use it to say things they wouldn’t dare say otherwise.

TCG: That’s true. Have you seen some of the Monkee fan web pages? There are tons of them.

PT: I hate alt.music.Monkees (at the time a popular discussion group on Google). It sucks! They don’t like me on there.

TCG: Oh, they like you just fine. You must have caught a bad thread. Have you checked out any of the fantasy fiction sites, also known as fanfic groups, where people write fiction about their favorite stars? Have you seen any of the sexual fantasy ones?

PT: No… really? Where?

TCG: I think MonkeeX was the first one to have those sorts of stories about the Monkees.

PT: MonkeeX?

TCG: ( I can hear him tapping away on his computer keyboard) Yes. Surely you have heard of this website?

PT: Yes, I’ve heard of it, but I’ve never been there. Where is it?

TCG: Yahoo groups, I think. Or perhaps it’s MonkeeX.com.

PT : Okay. ( tap tap tap)

TCG: Here is why I believe sites like this are interesting. Certainly for baby boomers, and the generations that followed, the first love for almost every young girl was a rock star of some stripe. Elvis, the Beatles, The Monkees, David Cassidy, Backstreet Boys, Bon Jovi, whoever. We fell “in love” with our popular musical artists. We all fantasized about them and even if the daydreams were silly or graphic, it was just between you, yourself and your diary. These days it’s all out there on the internet. These young women are expressing their carnal desires and writing about it for anyone, including you, to read. I find that a new and fascinating cultural phenomena.

( Silence)

…Peter?

PT: I think it’s a function of the times. It says here you have to be a writer to join this list. There are fantasies on here about the Monkees?

TCG: Yeah. Lots. Featuring you, Mike. Micky too. Not so many about Davy. I feel kind of sorry for him, being left out like that.

PT: Don’t.

TCG: (deciding to tease him about his heart-throb band mate). Awww. Poor Davy. Ya know, I thought for a second about trying my hand at it, writing something about him, sure… so he wouldn’t be left out. But I couldn’t do it!

PT: ( laughs) Couldn’t imagine it?

TCG: No, and I have a good imagination. Couldn’t do it.

 PT: Couldn’t do Davy?

TCG: Nope.

PT: Couldn’t picture him between your legs?

TCG: ( A mental picture forms almost against my will. I can see is cute little Davy Jones, wearing nothing much, singing “Daydream Believer”, shaking his tambourine. It’s an ” Ally Mc Beal” dancing -baby-esque moment. I shake my head to dislodge the scene) Yes…no.. I mean NO, I can’t see it! ( laughs) God, don’t throw me off track here. When did I lose control of this interview? Are we done yet?

PT: Okay. Pick two of your remaining questions, okay? Ask me your second favorite one.

TCG: Gladly. Tell me what a perfect day is for you. Give me your perfect day.

PT: ( Laughs) Oh… you shouldn’t have asked this one! I had one of those very recently. I couldn’t deal with having them every day, mind you, but…my perfect day is waking up next to someone I like a lot, having sex a couple of times…then a cup of coffee…having sex a couple more times…ummm, strolling through some interesting city like Paris, or exploring the bluffs in Malibu. A perfect day would include some good meals and good conversation. Some TV… “West Wing”, that’s a good show. Then sex, and sleep. That’s a perfect day. And, as Micky says, ‘Mother of Christ, it’s good to be king!’ ( laughs again).

Peter Tork fronting his band, Shoe Suede Blues, 2008. Photo credit: Joshua Kinder